Touched a ton of files to finally standardize on having trailing
final newlines, as best practice recommends and so our devs stop
accidentally fighting each other over it.
This was performed automatically with the following:
git ls-files -z '*.py' | while IFS= read -rd '' f; \
do tail -c1 < "$f" | read -r _ || echo >> "$f"; done
git ls-files -z '*.css' | while IFS= read -rd '' f; \
do tail -c1 < "$f" | read -r _ || echo >> "$f"; done
* Add new /casino route and template
* Consolidate lottery into casino and add initial template for slots
* Change /lottery route to /casino and replace icon with usd symbol and change sitewide const to reflect change
* Hook up new slots method to casino
* Enable Marseybux spending in casino slots
* Add UI for playing blackjack in casino
* First connection of blackjack UI to backend
* Add protective clause thanks to help from carpathianflorist.
* Create new Casino_Game relation and persist inside of blackjack
* Connect new slots behavior to Casino_Game table
* Create UI action management logic
* Add blackjack game status checker which adds persistence for blackjack
* Gonna handle this better, hold on
* Reorganize blackjack helper methods
* Reorganize casino.js to account for new changes
* Connect up to frontend
* Little changes ya know
* Display a message when winning in Blackjack
* Fix some issues with double down and insure
* Revert "remove owoify-py from requirements"
This reverts commit 4454648ea2.
* A little casino styling change
* Reorganize into a casino block
* Smallenize the card'
* Remove references to old game data on comments
* Add sql migration file
* Remove logic to drop old columns
* Fix two forgotten conflicts
* poll rework
* forgot to do joinedload on comments
* Fix logic errors with voting, SQL syntax.
Kitchen sink commit from review of poll-rework changes:
1. Fix seed-db.sql syntax error.
2. Fix SQL patch file duplication of *submissions* tables rather
than one set of submissions and one for comments.
3. Start makeshift SQL patch folder, since this is a large change
that contributors may wish to apply to their local instances.
4. Fix checkbox (non-`exclusive`) polls being unable to be
unchecked. For consistency with `exclusive` polls, they should.
5. Fix changing the option of an `exclusive` poll when both
exclusive and non-exclusive options are present in one comment/
post causing the non-exclusive options to become unchecked.
(which, by my reading of SQLAlchemy `Query.one_or_none()`
really could break quite badly in some cases).
* link relationships with their counterparts
* small modification to poll unchecking
Co-authored-by: TLSM <duolsm@outlook.com>
Snakes
outruncolors
Aevann1