sneed

schema.sql

@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ CREATE TABLE public.holes (
     marseyurl character varying(60),
     created_utc integer,
     sidebarurls character varying(60)[] DEFAULT '{}'::character varying[] NOT NULL,
-    snappy_quotes character varying(20000),
+    snappy_quotes character varying(50000),
     public_use boolean NOT NULL
 );
 
@@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ CREATE TABLE public.users (
     keyword_notifs character varying(1000),
     offsite_mentions boolean,
     twitter character varying(50) DEFAULT 'twitter.com'::character varying NOT NULL,
-    snappy_quotes character varying(20000)
+    snappy_quotes character varying(1000)
 );
 
 

snappy_rDrama.txt

@@ -4981,3 +4981,5 @@ oh, that's interesting and sexy
 [para]
 [Because it's not according to science](https://i.rdrama.net/images/1716140747899364.webp). The thing is, that once someone has been a scientist, they never stop being a scientist. They never stop thinking rationally and critically. They tear apart obvious bullshit with ease after years of doing peer review with actual scientists, after working with their advisors and departments to produce a worthwhile and defensible doctoral thesis, even. 
 The [photo](https://i.rdrama.net/images/1716140747899364.webp) was of a juvenile human female,  Tanner stage 1 (i.e. toddler),  nude,  standing in a pool of water. The child was not engaged in any sexual activity,  and the photo in and of itself was not sexual or sexualized. The photo was not, in and of itself, child porn, and in and of itself would not violate Reddit's Content Policy against sexualizing minors, except in the directive of, "If you are unsure of a piece of content involving a minor or someone who appears to be a minor, do not post it."
+[para]
+Show me her getting creampied by a BBC and then we will talk.